Think first, prompt second.
AI is a thinking partner, not a thinking replacement. Sketch the answer in your head before you ask — you'll spot bad outputs faster.
A friendly, no-fluff guide to getting more out of AI without losing your judgment, your privacy, or your soul. Smart prompts. Honest limits. Habits that age well.
Role: You're a careful editor. Goal: Tighten this paragraph without losing my voice. Constraints: - Keep it under 90 words - No new claims - British English Audience: curious beginners Format: a single paragraph, then 3 bullet edits with a one-line reason each.
If you only take one thing from this page, take these. Everything else is just tactics.
AI is a thinking partner, not a thinking replacement. Sketch the answer in your head before you ask — you'll spot bad outputs faster.
Treat every claim as a draft. Cross-check names, numbers, quotes, and citations against primary sources before you ship them.
Don't paste secrets, client data, or anything you wouldn't email to a stranger. Anonymise inputs. Read the data policy.
Disclose AI assistance when it matters. Don't impersonate real people. Don't train on work you don't have rights to.
If you can't tell good from mid, AI will average you. Read widely, write often, and stay opinionated about what 'great' means.
Use AI for friction, not flair. Summaries, drafts, refactors, translations — the stuff that drains energy from the real work.
Not magic words. Not "ultimate" templates. Just the moves that working pros run on autopilot.
Tell the model who it is, who it's for, and what 'done' looks like. Vague in, vague out.
Paste the source text, the data, the brand voice notes — context beats cleverness every time.
Specify the shape of the answer: headings, bullet count, tone, word limit. Models love rails.
First drafts are negotiations. Tighten one knob at a time: shorter, punchier, more concrete, less hype.
Check facts, names, code, and citations. Have a human sign off on anything with real-world stakes.
A simple skeleton you can paste at the top of any chat. Fill in the blanks, delete the rest, and you'll out-prompt 90% of users.
# Role
You are a senior {role} who values clarity over cleverness.
# Goal
Help me {specific outcome}, optimised for {who reads it}.
# Inputs
"""
{paste the raw material here}
"""
# Constraints
- Max {N} words
- Voice: {warm / dry / playful}
- Avoid: jargon, hype, em-dashes
- Cite sources you actually used
# Format
1) A {short / structured} answer
2) A 3-bullet "what I'd change next"
3) Open questions you'd ask mePrint it, pin it, send it to the group chat. The boring rules are the ones that save your week.
"AI doesn't replace expertise — it amplifies whatever judgement you bring to it."
"If your prompt fits in a tweet, your output will too."
"The model is confident. That is not the same as correct."
If it materially shaped the work — yes. A short note ('drafted with AI, edited by me') is usually enough. For journalism, academic work, or client deliverables, follow the stricter rule of the room.
Default to no. Use a tool with a clear data-handling policy, an enterprise plan, or a self-hosted model. Anonymise where you can, and never paste credentials, customer PII, or unreleased financials.
Write the first draft yourself, then ask AI to critique it. Set 'AI-free' hours for hard problems. Read primary sources. The skill you'll miss most is the one you stopped practising.
No. Models can confidently invent papers, court cases, and quotes that look real. Always click through and confirm the source exists and says what you're claiming it says.
Tools aren't cheating; misrepresentation is. Be honest about your process, respect the rights of artists and writers whose work you draw on, and keep your taste in the loop.
Pick by task, not brand. Try two models on the same prompt; keep the one whose answer you'd actually ship. Re-evaluate every few months — the leaderboard shifts fast.
Save this page. Send it to a teammate. Come back when AI does something weird — it will, and you'll want the rules close.